But unlike the previous tests, the Quadro FX comes in third place in viewport performance, and actually outperforms both the V and V at editing. I bought this card to run a 3D cad software that my old card was having trouble with. Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench. The 10 best VFX and animation breakdowns of Watch the best tech breakdown videos of the year, as chosen by our , Facebook followers. The V comes in third. I have always found its graphics offerings run extremely well and stably with DCC applications and, in my opinion, the ability to run three or more monitors on a single card through Eyefinity technology gives AMD a superior productivity tool.
|Date Added:||19 May 2012|
|File Size:||10.82 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This gives the V a tremendous advantage in memory bandwidth over the V The ATI FirePro V ultra parallel processing architecture optimizes throughput by automatically directing graphics horsepower where it’s needed.
Ironically, while reducing input latency is never a bad thing, it honestly doesn’t matter nearly as much in a turn-based strategy game like Civilization: So far, I have only put Softimage through its paces with untextured scenes only smooth-shaded polygons: Packaging should be the same friepro what is found in a retail store, unless the item is handmade or was packaged by the manufacturer in non-retail packaging, such as an unprinted box or plastic bag.
These work just fine, but fireproo may need more of them than are provided with the cards as standard.
This is something we will have to re-examine later down the line. Views Read Edit View history. With four DisplayPort outputs, it should be able to satisfy those looking for a budget alternative for Hawaii-based FirePro W and W With a slightly ayi advanced derivative of the Redwood GPU found on the V, the computing power of the V is very similar to that of the V, sporting the same Stream processors of the V HPAutodesk, Evermotion Individuals: Retrieved 16 June The V comes in third.
CG Channel is part of the Gnomon group of companies: Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench. In addition, the manufacturers offer much more extensive customer support for their professional products than the equivalent consumer cards. For the Mudbox tests, each card was evaluated in two different ways.
Again, the V leads the V, although the difference in performance is relatively small. Unlike traditional DCC apps, Mudbox works with very high poly counts average scenes can run anywhere from 8 million polygons up to the highest I have ever seen, million. This is quite the monster, and I have found very few situations where I felt I needed more speed out of the graphics hardware.
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench. Retrieved 26 Firelro The V, V and V all ship with just one adapter, and the V does not ship with any.
Its bit display pipeline offers accurate color reproduction and advanced visual quality. Archived from the original on 17 April The device driver facilitates the configuration of diverse display group modes. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
In addition, materials from third-party renderers other than mental ray do not display properly. Be the first to write a review.
In The News From around the web. Current technologies and software.
The Radeon line of video cards, although present in hardware, did not offer any support for stream processing until the HD series where beta level OpenCL 1.
The FirePro line is designed for compute intensive, multimedia content creation such as video editorsand mechanical engineering design software such as CAD programs.
V The V is a step up from the V, but is still considered an entry-level card. The end products i. AMD has quite the powerful line-up of professional graphics cards, from high-end monsters all the way down to its entry-level contenders.